Page 18 - Mar-Apr2023 Vol40 No7
P. 18

MTAS                                                                                       By John Chlarson
         Drainage: Responsibilities &




         Limitations of Local Government





         Drainage law in Tennessee is governed
         by the natural flow rule. The natural flow                            The natural flow rule says water has a
         rule says water has a natural easement                                natural easement along its natural paths,
         along its natural paths, and the upper
         and lower landowners must accept water                                and the upper and lower landowners
         that naturally flows, or that would have
         naturally flowed, onto the property in                                must accept water that naturally flows,
         question. (as opposed to the “common                                  or that would have naturally flowed, onto
         enemy” doctrine.) [Dixon v. Nashville,
         301 S.W.2d 178 (1976); Miller v. City of                              the property in question.
         Brentwood, 548 S.W.2d 878 (1977); Butts
         v. City of South Fulton, 565 S.W.2d 879
         (Tenn. App. 1978); Yates v. Metropolitan   states that all government entities are   Finally:
         Government Nashville & Davidson     guaranteed “-Immunity from suit …    When looking at a drainage complaint
         County, 451 S.W.2d 437 (1969).]     for injury…caused by negligent act or   here is a list of some of the questions the
         That rule is easier to state than to apply   omission of any employee within the   local government representative needs to
         in some cases, but generally a landowner   scope of his employment…if the injury   ask themselves:
         cannot:                             arises out of:                       •  Is my supervisor aware of the issue?
           1. Impede the natural flow of water.  …(3) the issuance, denial, suspension,   •  Is the drainage issue on city property, or
                                               or revocation of, or by failure to issue,
           2. Increase the natural volume of water.  deny, suspend, or revoke, any permit,   on a city drainage easement or right of
           3. Increase the natural velocity of water.  license, certificate, approval, order, or   way?
         The design engineer should do his     similar authorization;             •  Does the drainage issue impact the
         or her part to ensure that drainage,   (4) a failure to make an inspection, or   public health or safety?
         erosion, and sediment control problems   by reason of making an inadequate or   •  Will resolving the drainage issue
         are avoided during the construction   negligent inspection of any property;  benefit the public in any way, or just the
         of the project and thereafter, with the   A city generally has no responsibility   individual property owner?
         completed project. However, approval or   for drainage problems among private
         acceptance of a drainage design by the   landowners unless the city has itself   •  Is the drainage issue causing damage to
         local government does not relieve the   violated the natural flow rule.   public infrastructure?
         design engineer of either professional                                   •  Is the drainage issue confined strictly to
         liability or ethical responsibility. Designs   [See Miller v. Brentwood, Yates v. Metro.   private property?
         are normally reviewed for compliance   Gov. Nashville & Davidson County.]  •  Is the drainage issue a complaint
         with required design standards and   Likewise, in the absence of such a   between citizens?
         codes, with the government reviewer   violation by the city, the city generally has
         taking no responsibility for the outcome   no obligation to maintain the integrity of   The answer to some of these questions
         of the project as designed. The ultimate   the drainage, and no right to go onto the   may not be readily apparent, and in some
         responsibility (and/or liability) rests on   properties in question      cases, an unbiased 3rd party opinion
         the design engineer who seals the plans.  An exception to this would occur in a   might be helpful. It is possible in that in
         Local governments have specific     case where the landowner has created the   some situations the Municipal Technical
         protections set forth in Tennessee state   drainage problem by violating subdivision   Advisory Service (MTAS) may be able to
         law. Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-20-  regulations, stormwater ordinances, or   provide assistance.
         204 states that all government entities are   other ordinances or laws. In such a case   For MTAS assistance contact either:
         guaranteed:                         the city could deal with the problem as a   John Chlarson P.E.
           (a) Immunity from suit …for injury…  compliance issue.                 731-425-4785
           caused by the dangerous or defective   Other than this exception, not only does   john.chlarson@tennessee.edu
           condition of any public …structure,   the city have no responsibility in the case   Brad Peters P.E.
           dam, reservoir, or other public   of drainage problems between private   865-974-0416
           improvement…                      landowners, but the city also has no legal   brad.peters@tennessee.edu
         Tennessee Code Annotated § 29-20-205   standing in court in such a case.

         18    TPW March/April 2023
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23