Page 27 - Nov-Dec 2019 Vol37 No5
P. 27
• Increase and index the federal motor fuel tax, whose local governments of federal requirements and lessen
purchasing power has plummeted by over 56% since the federal audit burden and risk on states, require
it was last increased in 1993, due to increased highway states to allow exchange of federal funds for state
construction costs. While APWA applauds the funds on all federally funded local projects at not less
advancements in automotive technologies to reduce than 90 cents (state) per dollar (federal), with a dollar
petroleum fuel consumption, we also recognize it has for dollar exchange when funds are used to reduce
negatively affected the generation of Highway Trust fatal and severe crashes. Fifteen states currently allow
Fund (HTF) revenues. exchange of federal funds.
• Support a multi-modal system to enhance the
It is time to increase the federal motor fuel tax by 25 cost-effectiveness of our existing transportation
cents per gallon (10 + 10 + 5 over three years) and network through funding operational improvements
index it to FHWA’s National Highway Construction on highways and local streets, modern bus and rail
Cost Index. For the typical driver, this would result in transit, safer bikeways, pedestrian crossings and
an average increase of $13/ month - far less than the pathways, and airport safety improvements. Recognize
benefit in reduced vehicle repair and operating costs electric powered personal transportation modes
($605 per year for each motorist according to TRIP’s (bikes, scooters, etc.) as multi-modal transportation
May 2019 Key Fact sheet) and increased safety benefits. means to be planned for and accommodated. Include
pedestrian, cycling, and non-conventional mode users
Because the federal government has not acted, state in planning requirements. Support a level playing field
and local governments have had to fill the gap. Per for bus and rail transit funding, in terms of matching
the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), of $246.8 requirements and enhanced funding.
billion in total highway infrastructure and mass transit • Increase funding for transportation research and
expenditures in 2017, the federal government funded education, e.g., Highway Research and Development
only 24% – state and local governments funded the Program, Technology and Innovation Deployment
other 76%. During this decade, 31 states have raised Program, Intelligent Transportation Systems Program,
or reformed their gas tax. In fact, 44 states and the Local and Tribal Transportation Assistance Programs,
District of Columbia have higher state gas taxes and Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Increased
than the federal tax, as of 2019. Additionally, local research and education will enable improved safety,
governments have levied or increased local option and more efficient use of transportation funding and
gas and sales taxes to fund local, state, and federal infrastructure, by providing innovative processes and
transportation projects. Furthermore, motor fuel taxes knowledgeable professionals for the transportation
in the U.S. are well below those of other countries. As field. In addition, fund professional development
of July 2019, only four countries (Cuba, Haiti, Panama, training initiatives to develop a diverse, high quality
and Russia) have lower gas prices than the U.S., with workforce to support the increased investment in our
refining costs being approximately the same world- transportation sector. Investment in STEM (science,
wide. The federal government must now do its part. technology, engineering, and math) education in the
area of transportation will help to provide an adequate,
• Transition as soon as possible to a more fiscally well-prepared future workforce.
viable method of collecting transportation revenues
based on usage of the road system, such as a vehicle- PRIORITY: STREAMLINING
miles traveled (VMT) or similar user fee. A per-mile
user fee would also assure that all vehicles pay for the Current federal regulations can add as much as
service and investment in the necessary infrastructure. 30% to the cost of building transportation projects.
Reducing those costs would significantly increase the
• Expand access to, and adequately fund, innovative number of projects that can be built without new taxes.
financing tools, such as credit assistance (TIFIA), Modifications to the “Federal Permitting Process” are
loan guarantees, public-private partnerships, a federal improving project delivery, but more changes are needed
infrastructure bank, and local tax-free municipal to reduce project delays and escalating costs.
infrastructure bonds.
To get the best value for our scarce dollars, APWA
• Restore the ability for state and local governments to makes these recommendations:
issue tax-exempt advance refunding bonds to assist in • Set time limits for federal agency review of projects
lowering the total costs of bond funded infrastructure.
under the National Environmental Policy Act
• Enhance state and local flexibility in the use of (NEPA) so projects are not unnecessarily delayed.
federal funds so cities, counties and states can decide
which projects are best for their citizens. To relieve
View online at tnpublicworks.com 27